Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of antioxidant activation by potential nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2)/Keap1 complex inhibitors

Inas Saleh Almazari1 , Shada Youssef Elhayek2

1Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Zarqa University, Zarqa 13132, Jordan; 2Faculty of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40522 Düsseldorf, Germany.

For correspondence:-  Inas Almazari   Email: ialmazari@zu.edu.jo

Accepted: 16 August 2021        Published: 30 September 2021

Citation: Almazari IS, Elhayek SY. Evaluation of antioxidant activation by potential nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2)/Keap1 complex inhibitors. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(9):1861-1873 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i9.12

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the binding affinities of forty-one (41) National Cancer Institute (NCI)-generated compounds, to the Nrf2 ligand, and possible activation of Nrf2 in the MCF-7 cell line.
Methods: To investigate the inhibition of the Nrf2/Keap1 complex, the MCF-7 cell line was treated with each of the 41 compounds, at a working concentration of 30 μM. The extent of Nrf2 activation and corresponding Nrf2/Keap1 complex inhibition was evaluated in terms of Nrf2 expression and its antioxidant-associated enzyme gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS), using western blot analysis.
Results: Twenty-nine compounds out of the 41 targeted compounds activated GCS, and some showed comparable or greater activation capacity than the standard Nrf2 activator tBHQ. To confirm that the activation of GCS was mediated via Nrf2 activation, cell lysates were tested for their Nrf2 protein expression, and it was found that Nrf2 was activated by the examined compounds for more than 24 h, indicating that the effect of the chosen compounds were not transient.
Conclusion: These results might be useful for identifying better targets for cytoprotection, and for oxidative stress alleviation through Nrf2 pathway activation. Further studies are required on the effects of these targets on the prevention and treatment of various oxidative stress disorders, including cancer.

Keywords: NCI compounds, Nrf2/Keap1, Cancer, Antioxidants, Gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS), MCF7, Pharmacophore, Docking, Co-crystallized structure

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates